When Indian authorities quarantined tens of thousands of people in their homes to stop the spread of COVID-19, the move have unintended and unpleasant consequences on the lives of people it is supposed to protect.
Some of the measures designed to keep them inside – like the signs posted outside their houses and releasing their personal data – have made them an easy target for harassment and discrimination.
Bharat Dhingra’s family of six have been in “home quarantine” in India’s capital, Delhi, since his brother and sister-in-law returned from the US on March 22.
Neither has displayed any symptoms, but the entire family followed government advice and self-quarantined.
Then officials posted a sticker outside their houses that read: “Do not visit. Home under quarantine”.
It was supposed to ensure people abided by the rules. But for people like Mr. Dhingra – who was already diligently following the rules – the sign has caused “stress and psychological pressure”.
“Our house has become like a zoo,” he told the BBC. “People stop to take pictures when they pass by. Our neighbours tell us to go inside even when we step out into our balcony for a minute.
“We also understand that the houses that are in quarantine need to be marked for awareness,” he acknowledged. “Government officials have been very nice to us, but it’s the attitude of some people that hurts.
“Some people shared the picture of our house in local WhatsApp groups as a warning.”
He said it violated his family’s privacy.
The BBC spoke to several people across the country who have had similar experiences.
One couple, who did not wish to be identified, said that their home in Noida – a suburb of Delhi – had become “a place of horror for many”.
“We went into home quarantine straight after coming back from abroad as a precautionary measure. Little did we realise that we will be completely shunned by the community.”
What they’d like is just some words of encouragement on the phone or a text message.
“But everybody looks at us with suspicion – even when we are on our balcony. It’s in their eyes.
“We’re not meeting anybody. It’s really sad that we are being treated like this.”
Kuljeet Singh also faced similar issues when he was told to quarantine himself at his home in Farrukhabad district, in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh.
He had met Bollywood singer Kanika Kapoor, who later tested positive, at a party.
“The case was discussed endlessly in the media and that put so much pressure on my family,” he said. “All kinds of rumours started spreading. Some said I was vomiting blood and will die in a few days.”
Mr. Singh said that “people are scared and they believe any rumour on social media”.
His quarantine period has now ended but, he says, the stigma will take a long time to go.
“Even vegetable and milk vendors refuse to come to deliver to our house.”
Meanwhile, the names and addresses of those in quarantine were made public in the southern cities of Hyderabad and Bangalore.
“People [in home quarantine]were happily moving around as if they are on a holiday and that is why the data was shared,” a senior officer in Bangalore explained to BBC Hindi’s Imran Qureshi.
But experts say this violates people’s privacy.
“It would have been fine if the government had only published the name. But giving addresses is an invitation for trouble,” Bangalore-based lawyer KV Dhananjay said.
Meanwhile, the personal data of at least 19 people quarantined at home – including their telephone numbers – was also leaked in Hyderabad.
This resulted in phone calls at odd hours and unwanted advice on “how to kill the virus” for some of the families.
Ramesh Tunga, who left the city a day before the lockdown was announced on 24 March, said he was facing similar discrimination.
“I left Hyderabad to be in my village. I informed village officials and went into self-isolation even though I had no overseas travel history,” he said.
But it caused “more problems for me”.
“People stopped talking to my family. Everybody just believed that I had coronavirus and I was going to infect the whole village,” he said.
“Being careful is good but people shouldn’t stop being human.” (Source: BBC)